On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:37 AM, markor <email address hidden> wrote:
> 2. All javascript is Off. - Works with error message (With Firefox/Seamonkey complaining every time about
> sending request over insecure link. This deserves separate bug report after this one is fixed)
That isn't an error message - it's a warning for the user. Given that
the user is being transferred to a non-https website, it is entirely
proper.
> But,
> in usage scenarios described in this bug description,
> Fix does not results in Search working with displaying search results.
> This are conditions:
> 3. All ubuntu.com javascript is On, Google.com javascripts are off. - Not working.
I don't think that is a common enough use case for us to spend time on
it. The vast majority of users will have javascript enabled browsers.
The site works for those that don't. I think you are likely to be the
only person (or if not the only, one of a very few number indeed) who
permits certain javascripts and restricts others. Firefox itself
doesn't permit such a setup.
If you have evidence that large numbers of people have a setup like
this, then you can reopen the bug, but otherwise we can regard it as
fixed.
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:37 AM, markor <email address hidden> wrote:
> 2. All javascript is Off. - Works with error message (With Firefox/Seamonkey complaining every time about
> sending request over insecure link. This deserves separate bug report after this one is fixed)
That isn't an error message - it's a warning for the user. Given that
the user is being transferred to a non-https website, it is entirely
proper.
> But,
> in usage scenarios described in this bug description,
> Fix does not results in Search working with displaying search results.
> This are conditions:
> 3. All ubuntu.com javascript is On, Google.com javascripts are off. - Not working.
I don't think that is a common enough use case for us to spend time on
it. The vast majority of users will have javascript enabled browsers.
The site works for those that don't. I think you are likely to be the
only person (or if not the only, one of a very few number indeed) who
permits certain javascripts and restricts others. Firefox itself
doesn't permit such a setup.
If you have evidence that large numbers of people have a setup like
this, then you can reopen the bug, but otherwise we can regard it as
fixed.
-- www.mdke. org
Matthew East
http://
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF