On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:57:53AM -0000, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I don't know what you're looking at, but radeontool and smartdimmer are
> > *not* depends. Closing the bug again.
> Steve, I don't know what you're looking at, either. My sources are
> aptitude, getting the sources and looking at the control files and
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/karmic/acpi-support.
Ah, this gives the answer - it's only on i386 that these dependencies are
present, being assembled (who knows why) in debian/rules.
I'll clean these up and move them to arch-conditional package relationships
in debian/control so we don't lose track of them again.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 01:57:53AM -0000, Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I don't know what you're looking at, but radeontool and smartdimmer are
> > *not* depends. Closing the bug again.
> Steve, I don't know what you're looking at, either. My sources are packages. ubuntu. com/karmic/ acpi-support.
> aptitude, getting the sources and looking at the control files and
> http://
Ah, this gives the answer - it's only on i386 that these dependencies are
present, being assembled (who knows why) in debian/rules.
I'll clean these up and move them to arch-conditional package relationships
in debian/control so we don't lose track of them again.
-- www.debian. org/
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://
<email address hidden> <email address hidden>