On Di, Jun 19, 2012 at 21:01:16 (CEST), Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Never the less, libav(the source package for the build depends,
> libavcodec-dev) has been uploaded to main so no-other packaging is
> required.
FTR, while the libav source package is in 'main', its 'libavcodec53'
binary package is banned from the live cds. AFAIUI, adding a
build-dependency on libavcodec-dev to alsa-lib is okay, /as long as/
none of the resulting binary packages declares a hard dependency on
libavcodec53.
AFAIUI, such a solution has been discussed earlier in this bug, but it
seems no corresponding patch has been proposed yet.
On Di, Jun 19, 2012 at 21:01:16 (CEST), Mike Mestnik wrote:
> Never the less, libav(the source package for the build depends,
> libavcodec-dev) has been uploaded to main so no-other packaging is
> required.
FTR, while the libav source package is in 'main', its 'libavcodec53'
binary package is banned from the live cds. AFAIUI, adding a
build-dependency on libavcodec-dev to alsa-lib is okay, /as long as/
none of the resulting binary packages declares a hard dependency on
libavcodec53.
AFAIUI, such a solution has been discussed earlier in this bug, but it
seems no corresponding patch has been proposed yet.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4