Comment 8 for bug 236028

Arne Goetje, 2008-06-13 16:27:06-0000:
> I see the only additional characters are o͘ and ⁿ. So, sort
> them after o and n respectively?

I think ‘ⁿ’ should be sorted after ‘z’ rather than between
‘n’ and ‘o’, but I have not thought this through. Let’s sort
it after ‘z’ and see what happens.

> >> Agree. So, if possible please translate the above
> >> strings into Minnan using both, POJ and Hant scripts.
> >> Then we can have two locales, nan_TW@Latin and
> >> nan_TW@Hant.
> >
> > I still think we should concentrate on nan_TW@Latn
> > (‘Latn’ per ISO 15924, not ‘Latin’) first.
>
> Other locales use @Latin, they don't follow ISO 15924.

Let’s follow ISO 15924 for now and use ‘nan_TW@Latn’.

Arne Goetje, 2008-06-13 16:30:19-0000:
> Kaihsu Tai wrote:
> > * am_pm: téng-po·, ē-po·
> ^^ ^^
> I assume that is supposed to be 006F,0358 instead of 006F,00B7 ? Or is
> it supposed to be a tone mark?

Argh, the evil U+00B7 crept in. Of course they should be
U+0358, so
* am_pm: téng-po͘, ē-po͘

By the way, in formulating these answers, I referred to
http://zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AllMessages
where some evil U+00B7 fossils are still lingering.