Quoting Tuomas Suutari (<email address hidden>):
> Doh, this was already fixed upstream (see [1]), but it seems that this
> is not the only thing broken in lxc-fedora template. Though even
> upstream's current master version (5fe95ad1) did not work. I had to make
> some other changes too to get it working. I've submitted my changes
> upstream [2].
>
> To get working lxc-fedora template, just clone upsteam git repo and
> apply the patches from [2]. I can also attach the patched lxc-fedora
> template for convenience.
Thanks for the info, Tuomas!
> Don't know if this bug report makes any sense anymore. Maybe Ubuntu
> should just wait that upstream integrates the fixes and makes a new
> release?
We're hoping a new release can happen soon, so that may indeed be
the best route.
Daviey, can we get this bug un-targeted? If you feel the target should
stick, then I'll apply the patches before next release of course.
Quoting Tuomas Suutari (<email address hidden>):
> Doh, this was already fixed upstream (see [1]), but it seems that this
> is not the only thing broken in lxc-fedora template. Though even
> upstream's current master version (5fe95ad1) did not work. I had to make
> some other changes too to get it working. I've submitted my changes
> upstream [2].
>
> To get working lxc-fedora template, just clone upsteam git repo and
> apply the patches from [2]. I can also attach the patched lxc-fedora
> template for convenience.
Thanks for the info, Tuomas!
> Don't know if this bug report makes any sense anymore. Maybe Ubuntu
> should just wait that upstream integrates the fixes and makes a new
> release?
We're hoping a new release can happen soon, so that may indeed be
the best route.
Daviey, can we get this bug un-targeted? If you feel the target should
stick, then I'll apply the patches before next release of course.