On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Connor Imes <email address hidden> wrote:
> If package names are actually translated into other languages, then I
> agree we should wait, If they aren't part of translation, it should be
> safe to apply the patch since no other text is in the diff (the package
> names are standalone lines) and tags don't get translated.
They are part of the translation, I'm afraid. The strings where these
names appear are just regular strings.
The translators should leave them as they are, but changing the string
will still require the translator to retranslate the string.
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Connor Imes <email address hidden> wrote:
> If package names are actually translated into other languages, then I
> agree we should wait, If they aren't part of translation, it should be
> safe to apply the patch since no other text is in the diff (the package
> names are standalone lines) and tags don't get translated.
They are part of the translation, I'm afraid. The strings where these
names appear are just regular strings.
The translators should leave them as they are, but changing the string
will still require the translator to retranslate the string.
-- www.mdke. org
Matthew East
http://
gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF