lp:~exarkun/twisted-benchmarks/more-ssl-benchmarks

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Merged into lp:twisted-benchmarks at revision 59

Thomas Herve: Approve on 2013-04-26

Diff: 93 lines (+41/-3)

5 files modified

all.py (+1/-0)
speedcenter.py (+2/-0)
ssl_throughput.py (+4/-3)
ssl_throughput_bigwrite.py (+15/-0)
ssl_throughput_smallwrite.py (+19/-0)

api

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Related blueprints

60. By Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@top> on 2013-04-26

Teach speedcenter about the new benchmarks as well

59. By Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@top> on 2013-04-26

Catch up to trunk

58. By Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@top> on 2013-04-26

Oops. Try running the correct benchmark.

57. By Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@top> on 2013-04-26

Add the new benchmarks to the "all" list

56. By Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@top> on 2013-04-26

Additional SSL throughput benchmarks

55. By Thomas Herve on 2013-03-31

Add a new benchmark for fragmented line receiver, enable it with sendfile in all

54. By Thomas Herve on 2013-03-20

Write a benchmark for FileSender, soon to be optimized

53. By Jean-Paul Calderone on 2011-07-22

Go back to r50, before any multiprocess changes were attempted, since they do not work well.

52. By Jean-Paul Calderone on 2011-07-22

A lot of hacks to get speedcenter multiprocess operation working

51. By Jean-Paul Calderone on 2011-07-21

Switch to a multiprocess runner approach to isolate benchmarks from each other more.