lp:~james-w/python-oops/record-published-explicitly

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Rejected for merging into lp:python-oops

Robert Collins (community): Needs Fixing on 2012-06-08

j.c.sackett (community): Approve on 2012-06-07

Diff: 125 lines (+39/-11)

4 files modified

oops/config.py (+4/-3)
oops/publishers.py (+1/-1)
oops/tests/test_config.py (+25/-3)
oops/tests/test_publishers.py (+9/-4)

api

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Related blueprints

30. By James Westby on 2012-06-07

Check for the published key in publish_new_only.

29. By James Westby on 2012-06-07

Set a published key in the report to indicate when it has been published.

28. By Richard Harding on 2012-01-26

Update dependencies to note pytz and remove iso8601

Merged from lp:~james-w/python-oops/update-readme-dependencies

27. By Robert Collins on 2011-11-13

Release 0.0.10.

26. By Robert Collins on 2011-11-13

Relicense under LGPL per silbs signoff.

25. By Robert Collins on 2011-11-13

Doc update on req_var variable.

24. By Robert Collins on 2011-10-11

Clarity on None vs non-zero.

23. By Robert Collins on 2011-10-11

And release 0.0.9.

22. By Robert Collins on 2011-10-11

Add publish_new_only helper for managing fallback publishers.

21. By Robert Collins on 2011-10-11

Do not propogate oops ids of None to the report: they indicate that the oops was not handled.