lp:~kkubasik/django/aggregation-branch

Branch merges

Propose for merging

No branches dependent on this one.

Related source package recipes

No recipes using this branch. (?)

Create packaging recipe

Related snap packages

Related bugs

Related blueprints

6225. By Kevin Kubasik <kkubasik@linux-lznq> on 2008-10-09

inital aggregation commit

6224. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-09

Fixed #9239 -- Somebody read my form validation docs from r9177 and found a
typo in them. I guess that was predictable. Thanks, Berry Groenendijk

6223. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-09

Fixed #9325 -- Typo fix in the forms documentation.

6222. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-09

Fixed #9328 -- Added Scot Hacker to AUTHORS and moved a couple of other names
to their alphabetical locations.

6221. By kmtracey on 2008-10-08

Fixed #9053 -- Allowed for sorting of callable and ModelAdmin methods specified in list_display (added in r8352). Previously attempting to sort on the former would raise an exception and the latter simply didn't sort. Also added tests for this function. Thanks rgl and jenan.

6220. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-08

Fixed #9319 -- Fixed a crash when using the same model field in multiple
unique_together constraints.

6219. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-08

A queryset that has had ordering removed (order_by()) can have ordering added
again later (order_by('foo')). Or, at least, it can now. Thanks to Ilya
Novoselov for diagnosing the problem here.

6218. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-08

Fixed #6748 -- When printing the repr() of querysets, don't load or display
more than 20 objects.

This means that accidentally executing HugeStoryArchive.objects.all() at the
interactive prompt (or in the debug template) won't try to load all 4,233,010
stories into memory and print them out. That would previously cause resource
starvation and other "interesting" crashes.

If you really, really want the previous behaviour (e.g. in a doctest that
prints more than 20 items), display "list(qs)" instead of just "qs".

6217. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-08

Applying a limit to a queryset that already had an upper limit of 0 wasn't
working properly.

6216. By mtredinnick on 2008-10-08

The tests added in r9184 were altering the test environment in bad ways. Fixed
this with proper setUp() and tearDown() methods.