Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Aaron Bentley has proposed merging lp:~abentley/bzr/unbreak-merge into lp:bzr/2.0.
>
> Requested reviews:
> bzr-core (bzr-core)
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This branch fixes merge so that it works when the this_tree is not a
> working tree. The ConfigurableFileMerger was using merger.this_tree.branch, to
> retrieve the configuration, but it should actually use merger.this_branch.
>
> The test simply shows that generating a preview transform with a RevisionTree
> as the this_tree does not raise an exception.The attached diff has been truncated due to its size.
>
review: needs_fixing
I don't know why you proposed it into 2.0, given that this only exists
in 2.1. I'm guessing you just need to resubmit vs the 2.1 branch.
The discussion seems fine.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Bentley wrote: eMerger was using merger. this_tree. branch, to
> Aaron Bentley has proposed merging lp:~abentley/bzr/unbreak-merge into lp:bzr/2.0.
>
> Requested reviews:
> bzr-core (bzr-core)
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This branch fixes merge so that it works when the this_tree is not a
> working tree. The ConfigurableFil
> retrieve the configuration, but it should actually use merger.this_branch.
>
> The test simply shows that generating a preview transform with a RevisionTree
> as the this_tree does not raise an exception.The attached diff has been truncated due to its size.
>
review: needs_fixing
I don't know why you proposed it into 2.0, given that this only exists
in 2.1. I'm guessing you just need to resubmit vs the 2.1 branch.
The discussion seems fine.
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkt 8hfMACgkQJdeBCY SNAAM+6gCgz6ys8 C4wk4VP/ 1IUcKjU0a1D 6ojX/SYmOXGFbzo G2
MvwAoJHN0QnqkQT
=6RG9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----