> Are you saying that we should not write unit tests using doctest format?
Yes, at least that's what I do. They execute slower, don't they? But as you pointed out, the test was already there, so you just extended it. That's what I do, too ... ;) So you can keep it as it is if you want to.
Thanks for the extra comments in the code, btw. And all the clean-up work!
You have a double "allowed allowed" in there somewhere, btw.
> Conflict solved.
Cool, looks good. ;)
> Are you saying that we should not write unit tests using doctest format?
Yes, at least that's what I do. They execute slower, don't they? But as you pointed out, the test was already there, so you just extended it. That's what I do, too ... ;) So you can keep it as it is if you want to.
Thanks for the extra comments in the code, btw. And all the clean-up work!
You have a double "allowed allowed" in there somewhere, btw.
Cheers,
Henning