Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 09:18 +0000 schrieb Jonathan Marsden:
> Do you know if it is common to have such large patches just to overcome
> lintian warnings like this?
Sometimes, yes. As Dmitrijs wrote is it the only way to get reproducible
builds.
Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 16:57 +0000 schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
> Review: Approve
> I've merged the copyright fixes.
>
> I'll use chrpath for now instead of autoreconf patch, because it is less intrusive.
Use what you like more.
> Next upstream release will be generated with modern toolchain so the chrpath problem will go away. Hopefully =/
Yes, that's the real solution.
> I can't reproduce chrpath on my i386 machine. Are you on AMD64?
Yes, I am on amd64.
> Can you please test that chrpath is gone? (Please mind the latest xulrunner makes xiphos FTBFS Bug #427638)
Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 09:18 +0000 schrieb Jonathan Marsden:
> Do you know if it is common to have such large patches just to overcome
> lintian warnings like this?
Sometimes, yes. As Dmitrijs wrote is it the only way to get reproducible
builds.
Am Samstag, den 12.09.2009, 16:57 +0000 schrieb Dmitrijs Ledkovs:
> Review: Approve
> I've merged the copyright fixes.
>
> I'll use chrpath for now instead of autoreconf patch, because it is less intrusive.
Use what you like more.
> Next upstream release will be generated with modern toolchain so the chrpath problem will go away. Hopefully =/
Yes, that's the real solution.
> I can't reproduce chrpath on my i386 machine. Are you on AMD64?
Yes, I am on amd64.
> Can you please test that chrpath is gone? (Please mind the latest xulrunner makes xiphos FTBFS Bug #427638)
Ok, I have tested it on jaunty and it works.
Cheers,
Benjamin