Besides the fact that "&=" is an unusual way to deal with the boundary case, it's also inconsistent with the more conventional % implementation at line 391.
Chris, this would be a great fix to get in, could you revise this?
« Back to merge proposal
Besides the fact that "&=" is an unusual way to deal with the boundary case, it's also inconsistent with the more conventional % implementation at line 391.
Chris, this would be a great fix to get in, could you revise this?