Code review comment for lp:~cjwatson/charms/xenial/storage/fix-nfs

Revision history for this message
Stuart Bishop (stub) wrote :

Erm, ok.

Any bionic deployments should be using Juju storage rather than this charm as of Juju 2.5.2, after confirming lp:1783419 is fixed.

The code should move out of the charms/xenial namespace to a top level storage-charm project. That isn't your problem though, as the charm already is multi-series and in the wrong namespace. Whoever takes up maintenance of this charm can worry about that.

review: Approve

« Back to merge proposal