> 1. There's nothing wrong with a conditional top-portlet div. If you think > there is, you'll have to explain what it is :)
Frankly I don't really know what it is, but I'm assuming we wouldn't have top-portlet if it didn't do something desirable.
So I'll approve with a stern "put that in your pipe and smoke it, young man" look. :)
« Back to merge proposal
> 1. There's nothing wrong with a conditional top-portlet div. If you think
> there is, you'll have to explain what it is :)
Frankly I don't really know what it is, but I'm assuming we wouldn't have top-portlet if it didn't do something desirable.
So I'll approve with a stern "put that in your pipe and smoke it, young man" look. :)