On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Francis J. Lacoste
<email address hidden> wrote:
> What about the API aspect of this?
>
> Shouldn't markAsDuplicate becomes a mutator for the field?
>
markAsDuplicate has always been the mutator for duplicateof. This
change affects only the internal use of duplicateof vs.
markAsDuplicate. The API should be unaffected.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Francis J. Lacoste
<email address hidden> wrote:
> What about the API aspect of this?
>
> Shouldn't markAsDuplicate becomes a mutator for the field?
>
markAsDuplicate has always been the mutator for duplicateof. This
change affects only the internal use of duplicateof vs.
markAsDuplicate. The API should be unaffected.
Cheers,
deryck