I'm not a reviewer, but this looks pretty easy to review (and at least on the surface the change seems correct to me). The formatting fix at @@ -519,8 +520,8 @@ is unrelated -- personally, I find those distracting in a branch containing functional changes, but YMMV.
I'm not a reviewer, but this looks pretty easy to review (and at least on the surface the change seems correct to me). The formatting fix at @@ -519,8 +520,8 @@ is unrelated -- personally, I find those distracting in a branch containing functional changes, but YMMV.