Code review comment for lp:~doxxx/bzr/mergetools

Revision history for this message
John C Barstow (jbowtie) wrote :

It looks like a big step in the right direction, and enough of an improvement to be worth merging from my perspective. There are two additional things I'd really like to see, but IMO they could be handled as issues in their own right.

1) I would like to see 'bzr diff' handled in the same way, so there is a consistent approach for external tools.

2) I think that the 'add' operation should allow for optionally specifying a name. This covers the ability to add the same tool twice with different flags, the ability to work with two executables that happen to have the same name, and the ability to choose an alias that conveys additional information (such as 'cygwin-sdiff' on a Windows platform).

If we choose to merge this, I think the user and admin guides will need to be updated, with an eye to explaining both how to use the functionality and how to determine when it is most appropriate.

« Back to merge proposal