On 27 October 2010 00:41, Gordon Tyler <email address hidden> wrote:
> Martin (gz) asked "What happens with non-ascii filenames? I see no handling, so will you just be throwing UnicodeError somewhere?"
I think that particular diff you attached seems reasonable -
human-readable strings that aren't part of binary file formats are
most naturally in unicode.
The best way to handle this would be just to add some tests that use
non-ascii filenames. (They'll need to depend on the unicode
filesystem feature.)
On 27 October 2010 00:41, Gordon Tyler <email address hidden> wrote:
> Martin (gz) asked "What happens with non-ascii filenames? I see no handling, so will you just be throwing UnicodeError somewhere?"
I think that particular diff you attached seems reasonable -
human-readable strings that aren't part of binary file formats are
most naturally in unicode.
The best way to handle this would be just to add some tests that use
non-ascii filenames. (They'll need to depend on the unicode
filesystem feature.)
--
Martin