Code review comment for lp:~doxxx/bzr/quiet-serve

On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:02 +0000, Gordon Tyler wrote:
> I'm not sure, I just followed the example of the other tests in that
> class. Perhaps it's because if you started it in-process there would
> be no way to interrupt it and it would hang the tests?

So, you cargo culted, which is fine :). However this test doesn't need a
subprocess. The other ones did for a few reasons, but I don't see why
this one would.

subprocess tests are very expensive, its an exceptional thing to do to
add one.

-Rob