> ./bzrlib/doc_generate/autodoc_rstx.py:42: tt = time.gmtime(t)
> ./bzrlib/doc_generate/autodoc_man.py:48: tt = time.gmtime(t)
> ./bzrlib/doc_generate/autodoc_bash_completion.py:34: tt = time.gmtime(t)
> ./bzrlib/crash.py:245: date_string = time.strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M',
> time.gmtime())
>
> (I don't think they matter as much but being consistent and using
> osutils.gmtime() instead of time.gmtime() remove confusion about why the code
> base would use two different versions).
I haven't replaced time.gmtime() and time.gmtime(time.time()) because they run against the present time which is not buggy, will only be if we still use bazaar on 32-bit platforms in more than 20 years.
> Good work thanks !
Thanks
> ./bzrlib/ doc_generate/ autodoc_ rstx.py: 42: tt = time.gmtime(t) doc_generate/ autodoc_ man.py: 48: tt = time.gmtime(t) doc_generate/ autodoc_ bash_completion .py:34: tt = time.gmtime(t) crash.py: 245: date_string = time.strftime( '%Y-%m- %dT%H:% M',
> ./bzrlib/
> ./bzrlib/
> ./bzrlib/
> time.gmtime())
>
> (I don't think they matter as much but being consistent and using
> osutils.gmtime() instead of time.gmtime() remove confusion about why the code
> base would use two different versions).
I haven't replaced time.gmtime() and time.gmtime( time.time( )) because they run against the present time which is not buggy, will only be if we still use bazaar on 32-bit platforms in more than 20 years.
Do you want I fix it even so ?
> Final administrativia: please sign the CLA /www.ubuntu. com/legal/ contributors
> https:/
Done