Code review comment for lp:~fullermd/bzr/revspec-dwim
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 06:42 +0000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:
> Review: Needs Information
> IIRC, I thought the consensus was that if something looks like a revno and isn't, it ought to fail rather than fall through to DWIM? This doesn't do that.
That sounds undesirable to me. What if I have a tag 2.0.0 ?
Rob