Code review comment for lp:~gmb/launchpad/bugwatch-next_check-bug-544238
Revision history for this message
| Graham Binns (gmb) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
On 22 March 2010 16:10, Jonathan Lange <email address hidden> wrote:
> Why aren't you using the Job table for this?
>
Is there a reason to use the Job table? We decided last week that
checkwatches shouldn't use the Jobs system; it doesn't fit the needs
of our batched processing model particularly well and any such
solution would be a kludge.
I'll happily rename the field, though.