GuilhemBichot wrote:
> I will have to look at the agreement only later - alas.
> Regarding the patch: how about enabling the printout even without -v? I find this is just a line, so not really verbose...
I believe other commands (like update) similarly print out what revision
you end up on when the command completes. I think if we incorporate that
so that we have "pulled from X to Y" as the information line, it would
be fine to include that even when -v is not supplied.
A partial concern is that computing a dotted revno is potentially
expensive on large projects. However, it isn't expected to happen often,
so the tradeoff is probably ok.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
GuilhemBichot wrote:
> I will have to look at the agreement only later - alas.
> Regarding the patch: how about enabling the printout even without -v? I find this is just a line, so not really verbose...
I believe other commands (like update) similarly print out what revision
you end up on when the command completes. I think if we incorporate that
so that we have "pulled from X to Y" as the information line, it would
be fine to include that even when -v is not supplied.
A partial concern is that computing a dotted revno is potentially
expensive on large projects. However, it isn't expected to happen often,
so the tradeoff is probably ok.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
YthkACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMn5QCfYqaqi QIHzuO99hymp0v7 uFfz d06w7IHwYpKLsEv nLRKtKxmHL
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkt
EOkAnj+
=Y+ko
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----