Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 13:45 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Robert Collins wrote:
>>> I should add, my suggestion will make this _much_ better for folk with
>>> lightweight checkouts away from the branch. Rather
>>> than ../../../../path/to/new-branch, they can use 'new-branch'.
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>> I'm not sure if you noticed that I already check: "if '/' in to_location".
>>
>> I'm not sure what more than that you need. (I even added tests for this
>> case....)
>
> Oh oops :P. However I think thats more prohibitive than needed - in
> particular I use subdirs not a flat branch space. What do you thank of
> the slightly more sophisticated heuristic I proposed?
>
> -Rob
>
You're welcome to write it?
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote: ./../path/ to/new- branch, they can use 'new-branch'.
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 13:45 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Robert Collins wrote:
>>> I should add, my suggestion will make this _much_ better for folk with
>>> lightweight checkouts away from the branch. Rather
>>> than ../../.
>>>
>>> -Rob
>>>
>> I'm not sure if you noticed that I already check: "if '/' in to_location".
>>
>> I'm not sure what more than that you need. (I even added tests for this
>> case....)
>
> Oh oops :P. However I think thats more prohibitive than needed - in
> particular I use subdirs not a flat branch space. What do you thank of
> the slightly more sophisticated heuristic I proposed?
>
> -Rob
>
You're welcome to write it?
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org
XtmIACgkQJdeBCY SNAAOZnQCgpGYnQ o1UGFH0TVSNkKw4 q8sK BGP46CjeI+ aOKA6K6
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkp
i7AAnAhmzjS1FGO
=ZyoD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----