Code review comment for lp:~jameinel/bzr/2.1-client-reconnect-819604

> I should note, I think it would be prudent to land this into bzr.dev first,
> but I wanted to make sure it was written against 2.1 since that is the oldest
> client that we want to backport support for.

+4 (+1 for each of 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4)

No need to ask anymore, good, keep reading my mind ;)

I don't know exactly how we should proceed but as much as possible, all the modifications related to this topic should be done in a separate branch which should be merged into whatever series we target.

Backport is hard, let's avoid it as much as possible (but no more ;)

> Also, I expect there will be a modest amount of conflicts bringing this up
> from bzr-2.1 into bzr.dev. There has been a modest amount of changes
> inbetween, so I'll try to produce branches for each series.

Yup, that sounds a lot like a loom with a thread by targeted series. Or any arrangement of branches that makes our life easier.