Code review comment for lp:~jameinel/bzr/2.1.0b4-convert-kg-heads

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> So, all I knew was that 100 was a WAG :)
>
> If the tradeoff point is 6 revisions on mysql, it would be great to also
> have a figure for where it is on emacs, then we could triangulate.
> However, it seems like 25 or 50 or something might be better for now
> until we have more more data.
>
> -Rob
>

I'm having some difficulty downloading the emacs source. My laptop seems
to like to hiccup on new network connections periodically, and the time
to download all of emacs is outside of that time. I do have it
downloading on my server, which is a bit underpowered.

It did show our limitations over HTTP, as I hit 335MB downloaded, but
the repo is only about 206MB total. The download is also *very* choppy,
but that machine is woefully underpowered. (P-III 700MHz.)

Anyway, emacs seems to be 3.5s. So if you go with the same 50% +
3revs/sec you end up with 21.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksWev8ACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMv/wCeNGBEQdhdpOYKy+YcbBZ4E/Rs
MOwAnjyuNYtmU5wJ+Uh3azUscM0inIJV
=oHv6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----