On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 19:03 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> he important part is that 2 files end up with the exact
> same time, and the time shouldn't be before the time supplied. (To
> make
> sure that people doing sub-second reverts get timestamps that are new
> enough.)
How do you deal with FAT's 2 second window then? Surely it will go
backwards sometimes (to the start of the 2 seconds). Or is the time
supplied the time of one of the reverted files?
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 19:03 +0000, John A Meinel wrote:
> he important part is that 2 files end up with the exact
> same time, and the time shouldn't be before the time supplied. (To
> make
> sure that people doing sub-second reverts get timestamps that are new
> enough.)
How do you deal with FAT's 2 second window then? Surely it will go
backwards sometimes (to the start of the 2 seconds). Or is the time
supplied the time of one of the reverted files?
--Rob