Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Thanks for the review.
>
>> However, I think I would tweak a few things differently anyway.
>>
>> 1) It should probably be called "per_foreign" rather than "foreign"
> Wouldn't this mean we'd need per_foreign_branch, per_foreign_repository, per_foreign_branch_format, etc?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jelmer
It depends if you think you are going to have more than one branch type
per foreign type, and more than one repo type, etc.
At the moment, neither git nor hg have allowed anything of that sort.
I'm not sure that svn has either.
In which case adding the extra permutations doesn't seem to gain much of
anything.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jelmer Vernooij wrote: repository, per_foreign_ branch_ format, etc?
> Thanks for the review.
>
>> However, I think I would tweak a few things differently anyway.
>>
>> 1) It should probably be called "per_foreign" rather than "foreign"
> Wouldn't this mean we'd need per_foreign_branch, per_foreign_
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jelmer
It depends if you think you are going to have more than one branch type
per foreign type, and more than one repo type, etc.
At the moment, neither git nor hg have allowed anything of that sort.
I'm not sure that svn has either.
In which case adding the extra permutations doesn't seem to gain much of
anything.
John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- enigmail. mozdev. org/
FcJ4ACgkQJdeBCY SNAAMNzwCeIdhUQ 5KvUi/8GNUgDyV1 TayB KvC2dwTWPuw4UY7 3s
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkq
930An1GpW6cnBnB
=wjYm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----