> I wrote:
> > b) put boilerplate saying it's copyright you, and some appropriate licence.
> >
> > I don't know if (b) is an option.
>
> Actually, I see that at least contrib/bzr_access explicitly has copyright
> owned by someone other than Canonical, so I suppose this is allowed, or at
> least has been in the past.
So while it may be a bit ambiguous, I think it would be best if we could get the contributor assignment signed.
Johnf is that okay for you? If it is a problem, then certainly we can talk about it more.
> I wrote:
> > b) put boilerplate saying it's copyright you, and some appropriate licence.
> >
> > I don't know if (b) is an option.
>
> Actually, I see that at least contrib/bzr_access explicitly has copyright
> owned by someone other than Canonical, so I suppose this is allowed, or at
> least has been in the past.
So while it may be a bit ambiguous, I think it would be best if we could get the contributor assignment signed.
Johnf is that okay for you? If it is a problem, then certainly we can talk about it more.
The details should be here: www.canonical. com/contributor s
http://