Code review comment for lp:~jtv/launchpad/bug-553077

Revision history for this message
Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) wrote :

Thanks, less dependencies ftw.

It would also be nice to clean up some of the warnings in the package (using an old policy version, old (deprecated) debhelper etc) at some point.

I'm curious, is there any reason for the buildd slave code being inside of the main tree ? It seems like it could easily be moved into its own independent (more manageable) branch.

review: Approve (code*)

« Back to merge proposal