> Thanks, less dependencies ftw.
>
> It would also be nice to clean up some of the warnings in the package (using
> an old policy version, old (deprecated) debhelper etc) at some point.
>
> I'm curious, is there any reason for the buildd slave code being inside of the
> main tree ? It seems like it could easily be moved into its own independent
> (more manageable) branch.
> Thanks, less dependencies ftw.
>
> It would also be nice to clean up some of the warnings in the package (using
> an old policy version, old (deprecated) debhelper etc) at some point.
>
> I'm curious, is there any reason for the buildd slave code being inside of the
> main tree ? It seems like it could easily be moved into its own independent
> (more manageable) branch.
That's bug 547036. Thanks Jelmer and Jeroen.