On 17 August 2010 11:48, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> I'll do the tweaks; I don't see a good way (for now) of shrinking the
> test; two separate tests would require a magic constant to be shared
> between them rather than being derived on the fly; that would be more
> fragile.
>
On 17 August 2010 11:48, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
> I'll do the tweaks; I don't see a good way (for now) of shrinking the
> test; two separate tests would require a magic constant to be shared
> between them rather than being derived on the fly; that would be more
> fragile.
>
Right, that's pretty much what I figured.