Robert Collins wrote:
> Review: Needs Information
> This doesn't make sense: why would we want to have an output encoding that isn't compatible with the operating systems encoding? I'm channelling Martin[gz] here I think - I recall him asking this question in IRC, and I think its a good question.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Robert Collins wrote:
> Review: Needs Information
> This doesn't make sense: why would we want to have an output encoding that isn't compatible with the operating systems encoding? I'm channelling Martin[gz] here I think - I recall him asking this question in IRC, and I think its a good question.
Incorrect auto-detection. (Fairly common, Mac hasn't traditionally
detected well, neither FreeBSD, etc.)
Output to a file.
bzr log | less
vs
bzr log > content.txt
(On Windows, the former should probably use Terminal encoding, but the getpreferredenc oding() )
later should use locale.
I think the big thing is having this as a step along the way to being
able to supply it on a per-command basis.
John enigmail. mozdev. org/
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://
iEYEARECAAYFAkw fbKAACgkQJdeBCY SNAANDyACggTDoJ ffExuFR7Rkrj6X0 CxZi 3Ppezw6p+ +KQx/yrV
3B8AoI06keflVw9
=DM/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----