> I don't think we needed a separate format from the existing
> RepositoryFormatCHK2. It has only been around ~ 1 week, so there shouldn't be
> many people using it that would have trouble switching.
>
> However, the rest looks good to me, though obviously Robert had some doubts.
Laziness dictates not specifically removing that class now, but also not doing a specific fastpath export to switch from it.
> I don't think we needed a separate format from the existing tCHK2. It has only been around ~ 1 week, so there shouldn't be
> RepositoryForma
> many people using it that would have trouble switching.
>
> However, the rest looks good to me, though obviously Robert had some doubts.
Laziness dictates not specifically removing that class now, but also not doing a specific fastpath export to switch from it.