On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
[snip]
> +<<<<<<< TREE
> * Added ``cachedproperty`` decorator to ``bzrlib.decorators``.
> (Andrew Bennetts)
>
> +=======
> +* Delete deprecated function ``read_bundle_from_url``
> + (Martin Pool)
> +
> +>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE
It looks like conflict markers snuck in there.
> * Many test features were renamed from ``FooFeature`` to ``foo_feature``
> to be consistent with instances being lower case and classes being
> CamelCase. For the features that were more likely to be used, we added a
>
> === modified file 'bzrlib/bundle/__init__.py'
> --- bzrlib/bundle/__init__.py 2010-02-17 17:11:16 +0000
> +++ bzrlib/bundle/__init__.py 2010-03-30 06:00:48 +0000
> @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
> +<<<<<<< TREE
> # Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Canonical Ltd
> +=======
> +# Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2010 Canonical Ltd
> +>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE
And here too. Although, is that right? How'd did it go from
2005-2010 to 2005, 2006, 2010?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote: decorators` `. bundle_ from_url` `
[snip]
> +<<<<<<< TREE
> * Added ``cachedproperty`` decorator to ``bzrlib.
> (Andrew Bennetts)
>
> +=======
> +* Delete deprecated function ``read_
> + (Martin Pool)
> +
> +>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE
It looks like conflict markers snuck in there.
> * Many test features were renamed from ``FooFeature`` to ``foo_feature`` bundle/ __init_ _.py' bundle/ __init_ _.py 2010-02-17 17:11:16 +0000 bundle/ __init_ _.py 2010-03-30 06:00:48 +0000
> to be consistent with instances being lower case and classes being
> CamelCase. For the features that were more likely to be used, we added a
>
> === modified file 'bzrlib/
> --- bzrlib/
> +++ bzrlib/
> @@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
> +<<<<<<< TREE
> # Copyright (C) 2005-2010 Canonical Ltd
> +=======
> +# Copyright (C) 2005, 2006, 2010 Canonical Ltd
> +>>>>>>> MERGE-SOURCE
And here too. Although, is that right? How'd did it go from
2005-2010 to 2005, 2006, 2010?
-John