> I need to look at TestActivityMixin - it looks, right now, like you end up not
> upcalling in setUp, and that should cause a failure in the test framework.
>
> Other than that it looks pretty nice now. So 'tweak'.
It is just a mixin, and the concrete test subclasses do upcall (I think.)
There is a thing here where if it was sufficiently clean to do official parameterization, people wouldn't generate such mixins. But I got rid of a bit of copy and paste, perhaps vila will do more later.
> I need to look at TestActivityMixin - it looks, right now, like you end up not
> upcalling in setUp, and that should cause a failure in the test framework.
>
> Other than that it looks pretty nice now. So 'tweak'.
It is just a mixin, and the concrete test subclasses do upcall (I think.)
There is a thing here where if it was sufficiently clean to do official parameterization, people wouldn't generate such mixins. But I got rid of a bit of copy and paste, perhaps vila will do more later.