On 7 July 2010 00:21, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> If you're going to be documenting http[s]_proxy shouldn't you also
> document no_proxy, all_proxy, and the rest?
Good point. I didn't actually know about them. Where are they defined?
On 7 July 2010 00:21, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> If you're going to be documenting http[s]_proxy shouldn't you also
> document no_proxy, all_proxy, and the rest?
Good point. I didn't actually know about them. Where are they defined?
--
Martin