Code review comment for lp:~mbp/bzr/doc

Revision history for this message
Martin Pool (mbp) wrote :

On 7 July 2010 00:21, John A Meinel <email address hidden> wrote:
> If you're going to be documenting http[s]_proxy shouldn't you also
> document no_proxy, all_proxy, and the rest?

Good point. I didn't actually know about them. Where are they defined?

--
Martin

« Back to merge proposal