Code review comment for lp:~mbp/bzr/externalbase
Revision history for this message
| Robert Collins (lifeless) wrote | # |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
73416ba
(Get the code!)
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Martin Pool <email address hidden> wrote:
> On 22 June 2010 09:30, Robert Collins <email address hidden> wrote:
>> I agree that the test framework is buggy :) - I did say that using parameterisation would be better, I think. Anyhow, its all moot - it was landed as is .
>
> It's not really obvious to me how you would parameterize this. What
> would you do?
Make a scenario per revid I wanted to test with, and seperately a
scenario for testing that 1 rev in N is accessible, and possibly cross
multiply them.
-Rob