> The only question in whether '.control_files' is part of the Branch api, and thus needs to be deprecated rather than just removed.
It probably does count of part of the api. I think it probably shouldn't be, because it's not any particularly distinct part of it, just a historic implementation detail. It probably should be specifically removed.
However our machinery for doing deprecations on things like this that can be called publicly, overridden, and also up-called is a bit weak.
> The only question in whether '.control_files' is part of the Branch api, and thus needs to be deprecated rather than just removed.
It probably does count of part of the api. I think it probably shouldn't be, because it's not any particularly distinct part of it, just a historic implementation detail. It probably should be specifically removed.
However our machinery for doing deprecations on things like this that can be called publicly, overridden, and also up-called is a bit weak.