<noodles775> gmb: great. Did you have any thoughts about a better way to test the private method (as mentioned in the MP)?
<gmb> noodles775: Argh, must've skipped that bit of the mp. Sorry. Hang on...
<gmb> noodles775: So, no, I can't think of a better way (which is why I never balked at the use of rSP()). The only way I could think of is to test it indirectly, but I'd rather have the direct test myself.
<noodles775> Great, thanks for that.
<noodles775> gmb: great. Did you have any thoughts about a better way to test the private method (as mentioned in the MP)?
<gmb> noodles775: Argh, must've skipped that bit of the mp. Sorry. Hang on...
<gmb> noodles775: So, no, I can't think of a better way (which is why I never balked at the use of rSP()). The only way I could think of is to test it indirectly, but I'd rather have the direct test myself.
<noodles775> Great, thanks for that.