Thanks Michael! Michi and I do acknowledged this MP, but we'd like to investigate the possibility of a cleaner approach whereby we reduce some of the redundancy (especially with getenv()) that's introduced here.
This is not a stab at your work by any means ;) Thanks for your help with this!
Thanks Michael! Michi and I do acknowledged this MP, but we'd like to investigate the possibility of a cleaner approach whereby we reduce some of the redundancy (especially with getenv()) that's introduced here.
This is not a stab at your work by any means ;) Thanks for your help with this!