On 23/03/10 23:29, Jonathan Lange wrote:
> Cool! At first I thought this was about logging branch access to a file, but it's still great news.
Yeah, we should probably do that, but multiprocess synchronization argh.
What I'd like is to have bzr lp-serve processes log to ~/.bzr.log.$pid
rather than all smearing into ~/.bzr.log but that was annoying last time
I looked into it.
> This might be a silly question, but have you run this locally?
On 23/03/10 23:29, Jonathan Lange wrote:
> Cool! At first I thought this was about logging branch access to a file, but it's still great news.
Yeah, we should probably do that, but multiprocess synchronization argh.
What I'd like is to have bzr lp-serve processes log to ~/.bzr.log.$pid
rather than all smearing into ~/.bzr.log but that was annoying last time
I looked into it.
> This might be a silly question, but have you run this locally?
Yes I have. It seems to work :)
Cheers,
mwh