On 22 September 2010 01:21, Parth Malwankar <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> * support for somehow allowing selected unversioned files in the tree to be
>> included in the export. Perhaps by changing the Tree object that is being
>> exported?
>> * tests that demonstrate that support, so that we can be confident the use
>> case in bug 173274 is satisfied :)
>
> Taking bug #619478 into account, maybe a --all or --unversioned flag for 'bzr export'? I can create a patch for that before we try to land this in case one of the above seems like a good solution. Thoughts?
That sounds good. I'd used --uncommitted, to be consistent with merge.
On 22 September 2010 01:21, Parth Malwankar <email address hidden> wrote:
>
>> * support for somehow allowing selected unversioned files in the tree to be
>> included in the export. Perhaps by changing the Tree object that is being
>> exported?
>> * tests that demonstrate that support, so that we can be confident the use
>> case in bug 173274 is satisfied :)
>
> Taking bug #619478 into account, maybe a --all or --unversioned flag for 'bzr export'? I can create a patch for that before we try to land this in case one of the above seems like a good solution. Thoughts?
That sounds good. I'd used --uncommitted, to be consistent with merge.
--
Martin