Code review comment for lp:~spiv/bzr-builder/merge-subdirs-479705

Revision history for this message
James Westby (james-w) wrote :

On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 05:25:53 -0000, Andrew Bennetts <email address hidden> wrote:
> Considering that so many branches on Launchpad are 2a format now it
> seems to me that bzr >= 2.0 is almost a requirement anyway. Please tell
> me I'm right ;)

That's a good point. It may be that the archive we are using to backport
bzr-builder already has a bzr in for other reasons, and so that is
getting picked up.

Checking...

It does not, so indeed the newer branch formats can't be built on older
releases.

Filed

  https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/603615

about this.

Depending on how we fix this we could then not put the new classes in to
bzr-builder.

> A compromise be to say "merge-part" is not available unless you
> are using a new-enough bzr. (Again, probably >= 2.0 with the help of a
> backport in bzr-builder.)

I don't fancy that, but it would be an option, yes.

Thanks,

James

« Back to merge proposal