Code review comment for lp:~spiv/bzr/smarter-index-search

Revision history for this message
Andrew Bennetts (spiv) wrote :

Robert: Thanks for suggesting that. I've re-read a bunch of code and grepped, and as far as I can see, nothing is cheating by assuming [0] is the in-progress index that is being written. The test suite seems to pass too :)

So no changes needed there. I'm going to land this now before it goes stale.

« Back to merge proposal