I'm ok with an ini file; but would like to note that changing our
config is -only- heavyweight because we've chosen to have it so.
We can, in principle, have another config file referenced just like
you are here; I don't particularly care for that though.
I don't like the idea of another pg db either; zookeepr or something
may be fairly far away.
So I'm +0.5 or something on the ini; I think its a shame to have
*another* mechanism in play, but I'm keen on getting this work out
here; I think we should consider the presence of the two config
systems a techdebt bug and file it as such though.
I'm ok with an ini file; but would like to note that changing our
config is -only- heavyweight because we've chosen to have it so.
We can, in principle, have another config file referenced just like
you are here; I don't particularly care for that though.
I don't like the idea of another pg db either; zookeepr or something
may be fairly far away.
So I'm +0.5 or something on the ini; I think its a shame to have
*another* mechanism in play, but I'm keen on getting this work out
here; I think we should consider the presence of the two config
systems a techdebt bug and file it as such though.
-Rob