On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:52:24 Michael Hudson wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Looks fine.
>
> The "potato programming" aspect upsets me slightly -- surely you can get
> all subscribers that can see the merge proposal in one database query! --
> but at least it's not in the webapp and it's a very important bug to fix,
> so let's land it.
"potato programming"? Can you explain a bit more?
Yes we probably should add a query that gets all the people that can see a
merge proposal, although it is likely to be a chunky query.
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:52:24 Michael Hudson wrote:
> Review: Approve
> Looks fine.
>
> The "potato programming" aspect upsets me slightly -- surely you can get
> all subscribers that can see the merge proposal in one database query! --
> but at least it's not in the webapp and it's a very important bug to fix,
> so let's land it.
"potato programming"? Can you explain a bit more?
Yes we probably should add a query that gets all the people that can see a
merge proposal, although it is likely to be a chunky query.