All the new code looks good.
I find it worrying we are munging HTML rather than munging strings before we generate the HTML (break_long_words), and that the method name doesn't indicate it accepts HTML input rather than plain text. But this is old code.
« Back to merge proposal
All the new code looks good.
I find it worrying we are munging HTML rather than munging strings before we generate the HTML (break_long_words), and that the method name doesn't indicate it accepts HTML input rather than plain text. But this is old code.