Martin Pool wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 14:43, Andrew Bennetts
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> > I'm also unaware of any actual problems caused by importing the
> > lazy_import function directly rather than the module, so changing this
> > convention does seem to have no significant benefit.
>
> I'm ok with saying "normally use 'import module'" but I think this
> should be one of the exceptions.
Martin Pool wrote:
> On 17 September 2010 14:43, Andrew Bennetts
> <email address hidden> wrote:
> > I'm also unaware of any actual problems caused by importing the
> > lazy_import function directly rather than the module, so changing this
> > convention does seem to have no significant benefit.
>
> I'm ok with saying "normally use 'import module'" but I think this
> should be one of the exceptions.
I agree.